1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1952 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1959 Cadillac 62 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1175 kg more than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1952 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | 62 | Mayflower |
Year Released | 1959 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 45 L |