1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1954 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 1959 Cadillac 62 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1954 Studebaker Commander. (140 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1954 Studebaker Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 705 kg more than 1954 Studebaker Commander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1954 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Cadillac | Studebaker |
Model | 62 | Commander |
Year Released | 1959 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3673 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3070 mm |