1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1960 Toyota Master RR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP) has 285 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1008 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Master RR |
Year Released | 1959 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 40 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |