1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1963 Holden EJ is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1084 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 62 | EJ |
Year Released | 1959 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2680 mm |