1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1963 Lincoln Continental is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 275 kg more than 1959 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
Model | 62 | Continental |
Year Released | 1959 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 2400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3210 mm |