1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1964 Holden EH

To start off, 1964 Holden EH is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1033 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 346 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EH.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Cadillac 62 1964 Holden EH
Make Cadillac Holden
Model 62 EH
Year Released 1959 1964
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6381 cc 2929 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 325 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 583 Nm 237 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 1600 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 2218 kg 1185 kg
Vehicle Length 5720 mm 4560 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 3310 mm 2680 mm