1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600
To start off, 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 (247 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 weights approximately 585 kg more than 1959 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | 600 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 6332 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 2710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 6250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3910 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 112 L |
