1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1078 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Sunbeam |
| Model | 62 | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 6381 cc | 4259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 27 L |
