1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1966 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1966 Triumph Spitfire is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1966 Triumph Spitfire. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1475 kg more than 1966 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1966 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | 62 | Spitfire |
Year Released | 1959 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 725 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 37 L |