1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1968 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 1968 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar XJ6 (245 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 445 kg more than 1968 Jaguar XJ6.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1968 Jaguar XJ6 has manual transmission. 1968 Jaguar XJ6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1968 Jaguar XJ6 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | 62 | XJ6 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 104 L |
