1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1968 Zastava 850 K is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 290 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1363 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
Model | 62 | 850 K |
Year Released | 1959 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2010 mm |