1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1969 Ford Corsair
To start off, 1969 Ford Corsair is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1969 Ford Corsair. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Corsair. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1969 Ford Corsair. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1969 Ford Corsair has manual transmission. 1969 Ford Corsair will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1969 Ford Corsair | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Corsair |
Year Released | 1959 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 125 L |