1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1185 kg more than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1959 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 57 L |