1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1969 Volvo 120
To start off, 1969 Volvo 120 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1969 Volvo 120. (106 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1969 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1095 kg more than 1969 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1969 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | 120 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 45 L |