1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1970 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1970 ZAZ 966 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1970 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1970 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1385 kg more than 1970 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1970 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Cadillac | ZAZ |
| Model | 62 | 966 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2170 mm |
