1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1971 Datsun 240Z

To start off, 1971 Datsun 240Z is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1971 Datsun 240Z. (151 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1971 Datsun 240Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1150 kg more than 1971 Datsun 240Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Datsun 240Z. 1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1971 Datsun 240Z has manual transmission. 1971 Datsun 240Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Cadillac 62 1971 Datsun 240Z
Make Cadillac Datsun
Model 62 240Z
Year Released 1959 1971
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6381 cc 2393 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 325 HP 151 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 583 Nm 198 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 73.7 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 2218 kg 1068 kg
Vehicle Length 5720 mm 4140 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1630 mm
Wheelbase Size 3310 mm 2300 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]