1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1971 Volvo 164
To start off, 1971 Volvo 164 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1971 Volvo 164. (129 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1971 Volvo 164. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 765 kg more than 1971 Volvo 164. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1971 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 62 | 164 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2730 mm |
