1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1971 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1971 Zastava 1300 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 144 more horse power than 1971 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1971 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1145 kg more than 1971 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1971 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1971 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1971 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | 62 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1971 |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2430 mm |
