1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1972 Mercury Comet
To start off, 1972 Mercury Comet is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1972 Mercury Comet. (82 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mercury Comet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 905 kg more than 1972 Mercury Comet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1972 Mercury Comet has manual transmission. 1972 Mercury Comet will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1972 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | 62 | Comet |
Year Released | 1959 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2780 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2800 mm |