1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1974 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1974 Zastava 2101 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1974 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1974 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1165 kg more than 1974 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1974 Zastava 2101 has manual transmission. 1974 Zastava 2101 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1974 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | 62 | 2101 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1974 |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2430 mm |
