1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1976 Mini MK III
To start off, 1976 Mini MK III is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1976 Mini MK III. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mini MK III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1515 kg more than 1976 Mini MK III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1976 Mini MK III has manual transmission. 1976 Mini MK III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1976 Mini MK III | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mini |
| Model | 62 | MK III |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2040 mm |
