1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1978 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1978 Ford Falcon is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1978 Ford Falcon. (129 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1978 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 745 kg more than 1978 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1978 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1959 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2830 mm |