1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1979 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 1979 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1128 kg more than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 433 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. 1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1979 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1979 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Cadillac 62 1979 Mazda Cosmo
Make Cadillac Mazda
Model 62 Cosmo
Year Released 1959 1979
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6381 cc 1768 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 325 HP 93 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 583 Nm 150 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3300 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 88 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 2218 kg 1090 kg
Vehicle Length 5720 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 3310 mm 2520 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 65 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]