1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1980 Lancia Gamma
To start off, 1980 Lancia Gamma is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1980 Lancia Gamma. (117 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1980 Lancia Gamma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 880 kg more than 1980 Lancia Gamma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1980 Lancia Gamma has manual transmission. 1980 Lancia Gamma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1980 Lancia Gamma | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | 62 | Gamma |
Year Released | 1959 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 117 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 59 L |