1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1980 Volvo 164
To start off, 1980 Volvo 164 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1980 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | 164 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3350 mm |