1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1980 Volvo 66 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1303 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1980 Volvo 66 has manual transmission. 1980 Volvo 66 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | 66 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1550 mm |