1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1981 Renault 18
To start off, 1981 Renault 18 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP) has 238 more horse power than 1981 Renault 18. (87 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault 18.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Renault 18, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Renault 18. (181 Nm). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1981 Renault 18 | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | 62 | 18 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 87 HP |
Torque | 583 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 89 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |