1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1351 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1981 Zastava 102 has manual transmission. 1981 Zastava 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | 62 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2160 mm |
