1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1982 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1260 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | 62 | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2420 mm |
