1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1982 Toyota Starlet
To start off, 1982 Toyota Starlet is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Starlet. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Starlet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1523 kg more than 1982 Toyota Starlet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1982 Toyota Starlet | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Starlet |
Year Released | 1959 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |