1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 1982 Volvo 360 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1025 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | 360 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 58 L |