1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1983 Datsun 280
To start off, 1983 Datsun 280 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP) has 145 more horse power than 1983 Datsun 280. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1983 Datsun 280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 788 kg more than 1983 Datsun 280. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Datsun 280. (275 Nm). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Datsun 280. 1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1983 Datsun 280 has manual transmission. 1983 Datsun 280 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1983 Datsun 280 | |
Make | Cadillac | Datsun |
Model | 62 | 280 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 583 Nm | 275 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 7.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2330 mm |