1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1985 Volvo 780
To start off, 1985 Volvo 780 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1985 Volvo 780. (145 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1985 Volvo 780. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 705 kg more than 1985 Volvo 780. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1985 Volvo 780 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 62 | 780 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2849 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 80 L |
