1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1210 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1991 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1991 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | 62 | Clio |
Year Released | 1959 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 43 L |