1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC

To start off, 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. (141 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 168 kg more than 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications: