1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1994 Rover Range Rover is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (190 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1994 Rover Range Rover. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | 62 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3947 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 93 L |
