1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1995 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 717 kg more than 1995 Ford Mustang.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1995 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1995 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1995 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1959 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 4947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1483 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2580 mm |