1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Chevrolet Lumina
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Lumina. (155 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Lumina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Lumina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Chevrolet Lumina | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Lumina |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 56 L |