1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Ford Fiesta
To start off, 1996 Ford Fiesta is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 873 kg more than 1996 Ford Fiesta.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Ford Fiesta | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Fiesta |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 62 L |