1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Ford Windstar
To start off, 1996 Ford Windstar is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1996 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 526 kg more than 1996 Ford Windstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6381 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 1692 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 5120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1920 mm |
