1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 1996 Proton 400 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 990 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1996 Proton 400 has manual transmission. 1996 Proton 400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Cadillac | Proton |
Model | 62 | 400 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2510 mm |