1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Rover 400

To start off, 1996 Rover 400 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (85 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 905 kg more than 1996 Rover 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1996 Rover 400 has manual transmission. 1996 Rover 400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Cadillac 62 1996 Rover 400
Make Cadillac Rover
Model 62 400
Year Released 1959 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6382 cc 1993 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 197 HP 85 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2125 kg 1220 kg
Vehicle Length 5730 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 3310 mm 2630 mm