1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 1996 Rover 400 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1996 Rover 400 has manual transmission. 1996 Rover 400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | 62 | 400 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2560 mm |