1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Ford F-250
To start off, 1997 Ford F-250 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,800 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford F-250 (306 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford F-250 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1959 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 6800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 306 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 2380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3490 mm |
