1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1189 kg more than 1997 Ford Mustang.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1997 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1997 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1959 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2580 mm |