1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Honda Prelude
To start off, 1997 Honda Prelude is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Honda Prelude (200 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Honda Prelude should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 835 kg more than 1997 Honda Prelude.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Honda Prelude | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | Prelude |
Year Released | 1959 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2157 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |