1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 1997 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercedes-Benz ML (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1997 Mercedes-Benz ML.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | ML |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 72 L |
