1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 313 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1997 Renault Helem.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1997 Renault Helem has manual transmission. 1997 Renault Helem will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Renault Helem | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | 62 | Helem |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 510 HP |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 80 L |
