1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Suzuki C2
To start off, 1997 Suzuki C2 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1277 kg more than 1997 Suzuki C2.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1997 Suzuki C2 has manual transmission. 1997 Suzuki C2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Suzuki C2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | 62 | C2 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 848 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2240 mm |
