1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 De Tomaso Mangusta
To start off, 1998 De Tomaso Mangusta is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 De Tomaso Mangusta (321 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 De Tomaso Mangusta should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 725 kg more than 1998 De Tomaso Mangusta.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1998 De Tomaso Mangusta has manual transmission. 1998 De Tomaso Mangusta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1998 De Tomaso Mangusta | |
Make | Cadillac | De Tomaso |
Model | 62 | Mangusta |
Year Released | 1959 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 321 HP |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2680 mm |